ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
From South Korea to Belgium: Testing a high-density research reactor fuel
The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute has developed a high-density uranium silicide fuel designed to replace high-enriched uranium in research reactors. Recent irradiation tests appear to be successful, KAERI reports, which means the fuel could be commercialized to continue a key global nuclear nonproliferation effort—converting research reactors to run on low-enriched uranium fuel.
Yuxuan Liu, Kyle Vaughn, Brendan Kochunas, Thomas Downar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 1 | January 2021 | Pages 50-68
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1780853
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Over the years, significant validation work for the neutronics code MPACT has been performed against zero-power critical benchmarks and measured data from operating nuclear power plants. Among all of these efforts, however, validation of the pin-resolved capability in MPACT has been limited by the public availability of experimental data and to a lesser degree availability of measurement techniques and facilities that provide such detailed data. Recently, new measurement results to experimentally determine the reaction rate along the pellet radius from the IPEN/MB-01 research reactor facility (IPEN) have been published as a benchmark in the International Reactor Physics Experiment Project handbook. In this paper, we examine MPACT simulation results for several IPEN benchmark experiments with emphasis on the intrapin reaction rate measurements. The IPEN critical experiments with variations in system temperature and gadolinium loadings are modeled first with the latest MPACT cross-section library and linear source (LS) method of characteristics (MOC) capability. The MPACT results of two-dimensional (2-D) models with axial buckling are within 160 pcm from the experimental eigenvalues using the flat source MOC. Using the LS MOC, the errors are no more than 70 pcm, and the temperature trend of various cases is smaller. The MPACT three-dimensional models with LS show slightly worse comparisons than the 2-D models, which may be due to the isotropic transverse leakage and homogenized cross-section approximations of the 2-D/one-dimensional solver. For the reaction rate validation, MPACT produces intrapin reaction rate results within 2σ of the experiment and shows excellent agreement with the Monte Carlo solution. The observed discrepancies between the simulated results and experiment for the fission rate measurements are discussed. The kinetics parameters measured in another IPEN experiment are also compared with MPACT simulations using different kinetics data sources. According to the validation results, JENDL-4.0 and Santamarina et al.’s data are recommended for MPACT transient calculations.