ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Fusion Science and Technology
Finland in Front: The World’s Likely First Spent Fuel Repository Moves Toward Licensing
The year 2024 is shaping up to be a historic one for Posiva, the waste management organization owned by Finland’s two nuclear power plant utilities, Fortum and Teollisuuden Voima. The company is looking to receive regulatory approval of its operating license for the Onkalo deep geological repository for high-level radioactive waste by the end of the year.
Sunming Qin, Victor Petrov, Annalisa Manera
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 194 | Number 8 | August-September 2020 | Pages 583-597
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1755805
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Results reported in the literature have shown that the turbulence models currently implemented in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) commercial codes (e.g., ANSYS-CFX, STAR-CCM+, and FLUENT) have a tendency to overestimate thermal stratification and underestimate turbulent mixing when buoyancy effects become dominant with respect to momentum effects. Also, standard large eddy simulation models cannot fully capture the behavior of jets interacting with stratified environments because the assumption of turbulence isotropy of the smaller scales breaks down. Because of light diffraction and image distortion, it is challenging to apply nonintrusive optical flow measurements, like particle image velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), to get experimental data for CFD validations when there are density variances involved in the flow. However, a refractive index matching (RIM) technique that has been recently developed in our Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow Laboratory allows us to perform high-resolution measurements of velocity fields and scalar fields for turbulent buoyant jet flow in the presence of density differences as high as 8.6%.
To form a fully turbulent round free jet, an experimental facility was designed with a jet nozzle diameter of 2 mm, located at the bottom of a cubic tank with 30-cm side length. The jet flow is established by a servo-engine-driven piston to eliminate possible fluctuations introduced by the motor. A high-fidelity synchronized PIV/PLIF system was utilized in conjunction with RIM to measure the velocity and concentration fields in the self-similar regions of a jet flow with a density difference of 3.16% for aqueous solutions. With Reynolds numbers of 4000 and 10 000, the jet impinging with a two-layer stably stratified environment is compared to the positively buoyant jet with lighter fluid injected into denser surroundings. Detailed quantifications of the measurement uncertainties are also carried out. The experimental results are presented in terms of turbulent statistics and the analysis of jet penetration depths.