ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
A closer look at the initial NLIC selections—Part 2
In January, the Department of Energy announced its new Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus (NLIC) program, inviting states via a request for information to express their interest in hosting a facility supporting work from the front to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
By April, 26 states had expressed interest in hosting such a facility. At the end of July, the DOE signed memorandums of understanding with five states—Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah—to more closely explore the possibilities of state-federal partnerships. These MOUs are not firm commitments from either the federal or state governments. Time will tell which—if any—of the five states develop projects through the program. In the meantime, today, we are taking a close look at what Utah, Idaho, Tennessee can offer in terms of a preexisting nuclear sector that could support new fuel cycle developments.
HyeonTae Kim, YuGwon Jo, Yonghee Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 194 | Number 4 | April 2020 | Pages 297-307
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1698240
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Performance enhancement of the spectral analysis method (SAM) for evaluating the real variance of local tallies from the partial current–based coarse-mesh finite difference (p-CMFD) feedback is verified and explained. In the SAM, on successive Monte Carlo (MC) cycles, the real variance is obtained from the cyclewise samples instead of an explicit evaluation of covariance. However, if the cycle correlation is strong, there is a bias and variance trade-off in the evaluated true uncertainty. This study shows that the p-CMFD feedback reduces the cycle covariance and hence eliminates the trade-off. A one-dimensional slab reactor and a three-dimensional simplified BEAVRS benchmark problem are analyzed, and the real standard deviation of the local tally is estimated from the SAM and compared with that from the conventional multibatch method. It is shown that the SAM with p-CMFD feedback can accurately calculate the real uncertainty without changing the MC algorithm and incurring computation burden.