ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Texas A&M welcomes uranium conversion research
The Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) has signed a research agreement with Quantum Leap Energy (QLE) “to advance and de-risk the commercial production of high-purity uranium hexafluoride (UF6).”
QLE is an Austin, Texas–based subsidiary of ASP Isotopes (ASPI), which is developing an isotope enrichment platform for applications in nuclear energy, nuclear medicine, and semiconductors. QLE specializes in the uranium conversion step of the nuclear fuel cycle—the conversion of yellowcake uranium concentrate (U3O8) into UF6 prior to enrichment.
Thi Thanh Thuy Nguyen, Kwang Soon Ha, Jin Ho Song, Sung Il Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 193 | Number 8 | August 2019 | Pages 916-925
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1574118
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new empirical model is proposed for estimating the amount of volatile iodine in an aqueous phase. The volatile iodine concentration is estimated for highly irradiated CsI solutions in which the pH of the solution changes. The reaction of CsI solution with water radiolysis products is not balanced because radiolysis products are continuously produced under irradiation. Thus the kinetic of the chemical equation is important to determine iodine behavior in a CsI solution. An empirical model for the kinetic equation including the oxidation and reduction reaction is proposed. The proposed model was validated with a wide range of experimental data. A comparison of the experiments and predictions by the model indicated that the predicted volatile iodine from CsI solution with a concentration of 10−3 to 10−4 M was in good agreement. For 10−5 M CsI solution, the predicted iodine concentration was much smaller than experimental data due to the fact that I− was rapidly converted to IO3−.