ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Remembering Joseph M. Hendrie
Joseph M. Hendrie
To those of us who knew Joe, even prior to his appointment as chair of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, it is an understatement to say that he was a larger-than-life member of the nuclear science and technology enterprise. He was best known to the broader community for two major accomplishments: the design and construction of the High Flux Beam Reactor (HFBR) at Brookhaven National Laboratory and the creation of the standard review plan (SRP) for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
In addition to the products of these endeavors becoming major fundaments to their respective communities, they were uniquely Joe. The safety analysis report for the HFBR was written essentially single-handedly by him. This was true of the SRP as well, which became the key safety review document for the NRC as it performed safety reviews for the growing number of power reactor applications in the United States. His deep technical knowledge of nuclear engineering and his extraordinary management skills made this possible.
Jun Fang, Joseph J. Cambareri, Michel Rasquin, Andre Gouws, Ramesh Balakrishnan, Kenneth E. Jansen, Igor A. Bolotnov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 193 | Number 1 | January-February 2019 | Pages 46-62
Technical Paper – Selected papers from NURETH 2017 | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2018.1499280
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Absorbing heat from the fuel rod surface, water as coolant can undergo subcooled boiling within a pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel rod bundle. Because of the buoyancy effect, the vapor bubbles generated will then rise along and interact with the subchannel geometries. Reliable prediction of bubble behavior is of immense importance to ensure safe and stable reactor operation. However, given a complex engineering system like a nuclear reactor, it is very challenging (if not impossible) to conduct high-resolution measurements to study bubbly flows under reactor operation conditions. The lack of a fundamental two-phase-flow database is hindering the development of accurate two-phase-flow models required in more advanced reactor designs. In response to this challenge, first-principles–based numerical simulations are emerging as an attractive alternative to produce a complementary data source along with experiments. Leveraged by the unprecedented computing power offered by state-of-the-art supercomputers, direct numerical simulation (DNS), coupled with interface tracking methods, is becoming a practical tool to investigate some of the most challenging engineering flow problems. In the presented research, turbulent bubbly flow is simulated via DNS in single PWR subchannel geometries with auxiliary structures (e.g., supporting spacer grid and mixing vanes). The geometric effects these structures exert on the bubbly flow are studied with both a conventional time-averaging approach and a novel dynamic bubble tracking method. The new insights obtained will help inform better two-phase models that can contribute to safer and more efficient nuclear reactor systems.