ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Indrajeet Singh, S. B. Degweker, Anurag Gupta
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 189 | Number 2 | February 2018 | Pages 101-119
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1388092
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The fuel in high-temperature reactors (HTRs) is made up of tiny fuel particles (called TRISO particles) dispersed randomly in a graphite matrix. For the commonly used fuels, namely, enriched uranium or low-enriched uranium/233U mixed with Th, this dispersion may be treated as a homogeneous mixture at almost all neutron energies except at the resonances of the major nuclide (238U or 232Th) where the macroscopic cross section is so large that the neutron mean free path is comparable to the fuel kernel radius. In the equivalence theory approach used in many codes based on the WIMS-D library, this heterogeneity is accounted for by the escape cross section from a fuel kernel together with a carefully evaluated Dancoff correction factor.
In HTRs designed to burn plutonium, the fuel kernel contains oxides of various isotopes of Pu, and there is no fertile nuclide. Hence, the macroscopic cross section of the fuel is rather high in the thermal region, i.e., below 4 eV in the WIMS-D library (which also includes the two major resonances of 240Pu and 239Pu). For such fuels, the treatment of neutron transport in the thermal energy range must also include the random heterogeneous distribution of fuel in the graphite matrix. Since the resonance treatment method in the WIMS-D library, described above, is neither available nor applicable for thermal energies, a different method is clearly necessary.
HTR lattice codes such as WIMS and DRAGON use approximate collision probabilities between the various microscopic regions, namely, the fuel kernel, the coating layers, and the graphite matrix in the solution of the multigroup transport equation to account for this heterogeneity. In an earlier paper, we developed a simple though heuristic approach for solving this problem. In the present paper, we develop a more systematic theoretical method for solving the transport equation in a random dispersion by an exact evaluation of the collision probabilities in various regions of the lattice cell. The method has been incorporated in the collision probability code BOXER3. Comparison with benchmarks of Pu-based HTR fuels shows very good agreement thus validating the new approach. The method is likely to have application beyond the problem discussed in the paper.