ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NN Asks: Is the U.S. ready for nuclear construction to accelerate?
Craig Stover
Yes, but . . .
The United States is better positioned today for nuclear construction than it has been in decades. Some of that comes from the experience gained at Vogtle and V.C. Summer. I was part of the team that helped start the V.C. Summer project in 2008, and at that time we were trying to build a nuclear construction workforce from scratch. We learned a lot through that effort, and many of those lessons learned have since been studied, documented, and shared.
The nuclear industry is also benefiting from the wave of investment that started growing around 2020. Over the last five or six years, there has been a serious effort across the country to get ready for new nuclear builds. The U.S. government and the private sector are investing billions of dollars in new nuclear. Much of that work is happening before widespread commercial deployment contracts are signed. This is real, and we need to prepare.
Tsung-Kuang Yeh, Mei-Ya Wang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 161 | Number 2 | February 2009 | Pages 235-244
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE161-235
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is currently a common practice that a boiling water reactor (BWR) adopts hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) for mitigating corrosion in structural components in its primary coolant circuit (PCC). The optimal feedwater hydrogen concentration ([H2]FW) varies from plant to plant and is usually set at a constant value. When the core flow rate (CFR) in a BWR is changed, the coolant residence time in the PCC would be different. The concentrations of major redox species (i.e., hydrogen, oxygen, and hydrogen peroxide) in the coolant may accordingly vary because of different radiolysis durations in the core and other near-core regions. A theoretical code by the name of DEMACE was used in the current study to investigate the impact of various CFRs (from 100 to 80.6%) on the effectiveness of HWC in a domestic BWR. Our analyses indicated that the HWC effectiveness could be downgraded because of an increase in CFR at locations such as upper downcomer, recirculation system, and lower plenum. However, the HWC efficiency at the upper plenum area did not vary with either increasing or decreasing CFRs. The impact of CFR on the HWC effectiveness is therefore expected to vary from location to location in a BWR and eventually from plant to plant.
