ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NN Asks: Is the U.S. ready for nuclear construction to accelerate?
Craig Stover
Yes, but . . .
The United States is better positioned today for nuclear construction than it has been in decades. Some of that comes from the experience gained at Vogtle and V.C. Summer. I was part of the team that helped start the V.C. Summer project in 2008, and at that time we were trying to build a nuclear construction workforce from scratch. We learned a lot through that effort, and many of those lessons learned have since been studied, documented, and shared.
The nuclear industry is also benefiting from the wave of investment that started growing around 2020. Over the last five or six years, there has been a serious effort across the country to get ready for new nuclear builds. The U.S. government and the private sector are investing billions of dollars in new nuclear. Much of that work is happening before widespread commercial deployment contracts are signed. This is real, and we need to prepare.
C. D. Bowman, E. G. Bilpuch, D. C. Bowman, A. S. Crowell, C. R. Howell, K. McCabe, G. A. Smith, A. P. Tonchev, W. Tornow, V. Violet, R. B. Vogelaar, R. L. Walter, J. Yingling
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 161 | Number 1 | January 2009 | Pages 68-77
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE161-68
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The results of two experiments combined show that the diffusion length D for thermal neutrons in the graphite studied is 24% larger than expected from classical experiments and that the boron equivalent absorption is smaller than expected and consistent with zero. Taken together, the results indicate a reduction in parasitic thermal neutron absorption in heterogeneous graphite reactors by about 30%. The first experiment measured the z-dependence of thermal neutron flux in a column of 12 t of granular graphite with a neutron source at the bottom. A second measurement was made by pulsing the column with a neutron source at its center and measuring the neutron decay rate as a function of time after a pure exponential decay had been established. The diffusion coefficient D adjusted to a density of 1.60 g/cm3 is 1.05 ± 0.03 cm compared with the commonly accepted value of 0.85 ± 0.013 cm. The absorption in our graphite owing to impurities was found to be <10% of that from carbon alone. The parameter a/D that measures neutron loss was determined to be 0.000235 ± 0.000026 cm-2 for a density of 1.60 g/cm3 and may be compared with the commonly accepted value of 0.000340. The performance of graphite thermal spectrum reactors constructed using our graphite would be significantly enhanced over present expectations because neutron loss to graphite is a major factor in the neutron economy of graphite-moderated thermal reactors.