ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Jim E. Morel, James S. Warsa, Brian C. Franke, Anil K. Prinja
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 185 | Number 2 | February 2017 | Pages 325-334
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2016.1272383
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We compare two methods for generating Galerkin quadratures. In method 1, the standard SN method is used to generate the moment-to-discrete matrix and the discrete-to-moment matrix is generated by inverting the moment-to-discrete matrix. This is a particular form of the original Galerkin quadrature method. In method 2, which we introduce here, the standard SN method is used to generate the discrete-to-moment matrix and the moment-to-discrete matrix is generated by inverting the discrete-to-moment matrix. With an N-point quadrature, method 1 has the advantage that it preserves N eigenvalues and N eigenvectors of the scattering operator in a pointwise sense. With an N-point quadrature, method 2 has the advantage that it generates consistent angular moment equations from the corresponding SN equations while preserving N eigenvalues of the scattering operator. Our computational results indicate that these two methods are quite comparable for the test problem considered.