ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
3D-printed tool at SRS makes quicker work of tank waste sampling
A 3D-printed tool has been developed at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in South Carolina that can eliminate months from the job of radioactive tank waste sampling.
Wayne Arter, J. Guy Morgan, Samuel D. Relton, Nicholas J. Higham
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 184 | Number 4 | December 2016 | Pages 561-574
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-23
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Pathways-reduced analysis is one of the techniques used by the FISPACT-II nuclear activation and transmutation software to study the sensitivity of the computed inventories to uncertainties in reaction cross sections. Although deciding which pathways are most important is very helpful in for example determining which nuclear data would benefit from further refinement, pathways-reduced analysis need not necessarily define the most critical reaction, since one reaction may contribute to several different pathways. This work examines three different techniques for ranking reactions in their order of importance in determining the final inventory, comparing the pathways-based metric (PBM), the direct method, and a method based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. Reasons why the PBM is to be preferred are presented.