ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC asks for comments on FY 2026 fees proposal
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is looking for feedback on its proposed rule for fees for fiscal year 2026, which begins October 1. The proposal was published in the March 12 Federal Register.
Based on the FY 2026 budget request because a full-year appropriation has not yet been enacted for the fiscal year, the proposed request is $971.5 million, an increase of $27.4 million from FY 2025.
Thomas M. Sutton
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 185 | Number 1 | January 2017 | Pages 174-183
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE15-131
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the study of Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties for iterated-fission-source calculations, an important distinction is made between the real and the apparent variances. The former is the actual variance of a Monte Carlo calculation result, while the latter is an estimate of the former obtained using the results of the fission generations in the formula for uncorrelated random variates. For years it has been known that the apparent variance is a biased estimate of the real variance, and the reason for the bias has been understood. More recently, several authors have noted various interesting phenomena regarding the apparent and the real variances and the relationships among them. Some of these are an increase in the apparent variance near surfaces with reflecting boundary conditions, a nonuniform spatial distribution of the ratio of the apparent-to-real variance, the dependence of this ratio on the size of the region over which the result is tallied, and a rate of convergence of the real variance that is less than the inverse of the number of neutron histories run. This paper discusses a theoretical description of the Monte Carlo process using a discretized phase-space and then uses it to explain the causes of these phenomena.