ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Tarek Zaki, Peter Yarsky
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 184 | Number 3 | November 2016 | Pages 346-352
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE16-14
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In a related paper (L. Cheng et al., “TRACE/PARCS Analysis of Anticipated Transient Without Scram with Instability for a MELLLA+ BWR/5,” Nucl. Technol. Vol. 196), the results of TRACE/PARCS calculations for representative anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) events leading to core instability (ATWS-I) were presented. In that analysis, instability onset was observed in response to changing plant conditions of power, flow, and feedwater temperature. The baseline calculations were performed without using a PARCS feature to simulate noise in the reactor.
When a simulated reactor is unstable but is in a steady-state condition, an analytical tool may not show the onset of instability because there would not be a perturbation to excite oscillation. Such a condition of artificial stability could not persist in an actual reactor where subtle variation of local conditions (e.g., void fraction) would provide a constant source of perturbation, or “noise.” The regulatory purpose of the current work is to study the reliability of the TRACE/PARCS prediction of instability onset and oscillation growth during ATWS-I by providing a source of noise in the simulation. In addition, the results of this study support a generic methodology recommendation for any future studies.
PARCS has a feature that can simulate the reactivity effect of perturbations in the local void fraction. This feature, referred to as the white noise feature, is used to provide an artificial source of constant, local perturbation that would more closely mimic the actual reactor condition where local void fractions are constantly changing. Sensitivity of the onset timing and growth was studied by varying the magnitude, frequency, and contour of the perturbations applied by the white noise feature.
The study concludes that the onset timing and growth of both the initial corewide and subsequent bimodal oscillation stabilized at a certain combination of perturbation magnitude, frequency range, and frequency resolution. With the appropriate range of these parameters, the instability onset occurs ~20 s earlier, and peak oscillation amplitude is achieved ~15 s earlier when compared to the baseline calculations. Given the importance of oscillation onset and growth on potential fuel damage, this study recommends a specific methodology with respect to white noise to ensure reliable prediction with TRACE/PARCS for future studies.
