ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE seeks proposals for AI data centers at Paducah
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management has issued a request for offer (RFO) seeking proposals from U.S. companies to build and power AI data centers on the DOE’s Paducah Site in Kentucky. Companies are being sought to potentially enter into one or more long-term leasing agreements at the site that would be solely funded by the applicants.
Risto Vanhanen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 181 | Number 1 | September 2015 | Pages 60-71
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-105
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is not uncommon that the covariances of multigroup nuclear data do not obey the sum rules of nuclear data. We present a matrix nearness problem of finding a nearest symmetric matrix with given null vectors and solve it when the distance is measured in the Frobenius norm. The problem appears to be new. We propose that the method should be used to find nearest consistent multigroup covariance matrices with respect to the sum rules of redundant nuclear data.
If the multigroup covariances cannot be easily interpreted in a consistent manner, there is some ambiguity in choosing values for the covariances that are not explicitly mentioned. We present and compare a simple and a heuristic characterization method.
Three practical examples are processed and analyzed: relative covariances of cross sections of 9440Zr and absolute covariances of cross sections of 5024Cr and 23290Th. We demonstrate that satisfactory results can be achieved.
We discuss the properties of the proposed method and the characterization methods and suggest possible improvements. The methods can be used as a part of a quality assurance program and might be valuable additions to nuclear data processing codes.