ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
M. P. Sharma, A. K. Nayak
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 180 | Number 2 | June 2015 | Pages 172-181
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-102
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR) is a vertical pressure tube–type, heavy water–moderated, boiling light water–cooled, natural-circulation–based reactor. The fuel bundle of AHWR contains 54 fuel rods arranged in three concentric rings of 12, 18, and 24 fuel rods. This fuel bundle is divided into a number of imaginary interacting flow passages called subchannels. A single-phase-flow condition exists in the reactor rod bundle during the start-up condition and up to a certain length of rod bundle when it is operating at full power. Predicting the thermal margin of the reactor during the start-up condition has necessitated the determination of the turbulent mixing rate of the coolant among these subchannels. Thus, it is vital to evaluate the turbulent mixing between the subchannels of the AHWR rod bundle.
In this paper, experiments were carried out to determine the turbulent mixing rate in the simulated subchannels of the reactor. The size of the rod and the pitch in the test were the same as those of the actual rod bundle in the prototype. Three subchannels are considered in 1/12th of the cross section of the rod bundle. Water was used as the working fluid, and the turbulent mixing tests were carried out at the atmospheric condition without heat addition. The mean velocity in the subchannel was varied from 0 to 1.2 m/s. The flow conditions were closer to the actual reactor condition. The turbulent mixing rate was experimentally determined by adding tracer fluid in one subchannel and measuring the concentration of that in other subchannels at the end of the flow path. The test data were compared with existing models in literature. It was found that none of the models could predict the measured turbulent mixing rate in the rod bundle of the reactor. This is because the turbulent mixing rate is highly dependent on geometry. An empirical model is derived based on these experimental data, and it is found that this correlation can predict the turbulent mixing rate quite accurately.