ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40—2025
Last year, we proudly launched the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 list to shine a spotlight on the exceptional young professionals driving the nuclear sector forward as the nuclear community faces a dramatic generational shift. We weren’t sure how a second list would go over, but once again, our members resoundingly answered the call, confirming what we already knew: The nuclear community is bursting with vision, talent, and extraordinary dedication.
C. Parisi, E. Negrenti, M. Pecchia
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 4 | December 2014 | Pages 524-538
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-40
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper summarizes the evaluation for core I and core VIII of the Babcock & Wilcox Spectral Shift Control Reactor critical experiment program. The Spectral Shift Control Reactor concept, moderated and cooled by a variable mixture of heavy and light water, envisaged changing of the thermal neutron spectrum during the operation to encourage breeding and to sustain the core criticality. Core I contained 484 fuel rods with 4% UO2 fuel in light water while core VIII contained 2188 fuel rods with 93% enriched UO2-ThO2 fuel in a moderator mixture of heavy and light water. For core I, the criticality experiment and measurements of the thermal disadvantage factor were evaluated. For core VIII, only the criticality experiment was evaluated. For both cores, experimental uncertainties were determined confirming the good level of accuracy achieved by the experimentalists. Based on the experimental configurations, benchmarks were proposed, and their biases were determined.