ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Evgeny Ivanov, Tatiana Ivanova, Sophie Pignet
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 3 | November 2014 | Pages 363-376
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-25
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective delayed neutron fraction βeff is of primary importance for reactivity control of fissile systems and therefore for reactor design and safety analyses. Validation of βeff calculations is complicated by the limited availability of benchmark-quality data. This paper focuses on evaluation and analysis of βeff measurements with 252Cf-source pseudo-worth and noise methods performed at SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B assemblies in Germany in the 1970s. The experiments are thoroughly documented in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments and briefly presented in this paper. The measurements performed with the two different methods on SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B and other facilities systematically produce different values. Given that the noise approach presumes evolution of neutron field fluctuations in a one-point kinetic model, it was assumed that the discrepancies originate from spatial effects. A two-point kinetic model was tested to check this assumption. The paper demonstrates that the βeff measured with the noise method on the SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B facilities should be corrected while the 252Cf-source pseudo-worth measurement produces an accurate value.