ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Nuclear Dirigo
On April 22, 1959, Rear Admiral George J. King, superintendent of the Maine Maritime Academy, announced that following the completion of the 1960 training cruise, cadets would begin the study of nuclear engineering. Courses at that time included radiation physics, reactor control and instrumentation, reactor theory and engineering, thermodynamics, shielding, core design, reactor maintenance, and nuclear aspects.
Evgeny Ivanov, Tatiana Ivanova, Sophie Pignet
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 3 | November 2014 | Pages 363-376
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-25
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective delayed neutron fraction βeff is of primary importance for reactivity control of fissile systems and therefore for reactor design and safety analyses. Validation of βeff calculations is complicated by the limited availability of benchmark-quality data. This paper focuses on evaluation and analysis of βeff measurements with 252Cf-source pseudo-worth and noise methods performed at SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B assemblies in Germany in the 1970s. The experiments are thoroughly documented in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments and briefly presented in this paper. The measurements performed with the two different methods on SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B and other facilities systematically produce different values. Given that the noise approach presumes evolution of neutron field fluctuations in a one-point kinetic model, it was assumed that the discrepancies originate from spatial effects. A two-point kinetic model was tested to check this assumption. The paper demonstrates that the βeff measured with the noise method on the SNEAK 7A and SNEAK 7B facilities should be corrected while the 252Cf-source pseudo-worth measurement produces an accurate value.