ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
Edward W. Larsen, Blake W. Kelley
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 1 | September 2014 | Pages 1-15
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-47
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The coarse-mesh finite difference (CMFD) and the coarse-mesh diffusion synthetic acceleration (CMDSA) methods are widely used, independently developed methods for accelerating the iterative convergence of deterministic neutron transport calculations. In this paper, we show that these methods have the following theoretical relationship: If the standard notion of diffusion synthetic acceleration as a fine-mesh method is straightforwardly generalized to a coarse-mesh method, then the linearized form of the CMFD method is algebraically equivalent to a CMDSA method. We also show theoretically (via Fourier analysis) and experimentally (via simulations) that for fixed-source problems, the CMDSA and CMFD methods have nearly identical convergence rates. Our numerical results confirm the close theoretically predicted relationship between these methods.