ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC session addresses reactor restarts—and lessons learned at Palisades
At last week’s Regulatory Information Conference, Jamie Pelton cochaired a panel on the Palisades nuclear plant’s restart—a “historic restart,” as she put it.
Her choice of words was perhaps an understatement. After all, no U.S. nuclear plant has yet restarted after being slated for decommissioning.
Odmaa Sambuu, Toru Obara
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 177 | Number 1 | May 2014 | Pages 97-110
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-22
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the past decade, greater emphasis has been placed in nuclear reactor design on passive systems for the removal of decay heat. This study focuses on the passive safety feature of decay heat removal in modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs). The availability of this feature depends largely on reactor dimensions, power, and initial core temperature. It is assumed that the initial temperatures of fuel, graphite matrix, and coolant are the same, and so are represented by the initial core temperature, which is uniformly distributed throughout the core. However, little is known in general about the relationships among the parameters mentioned above or on the ability of the core to passively reject decay heat. To obtain a general understanding of the relationship of those parameters in HTGRs, analyses were performed, estimating the effects of initial core and soil temperatures and of the presence of structural materials on the maximum core temperature, allowable power, and size. Appropriate sizes were evaluated for reactors with given powers having various maximum power densities and operating at different initial core temperatures. Criticality and burnup analyses for the proposed reactors were performed, and it was found that all reactors with 20 wt% of uranium enrichment can be critical for over 16 years of operation.