ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Dingkang Zhang, Farzad Rahnema
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 176 | Number 1 | January 2014 | Pages 69-80
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE13-1
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this work, a high-order perturbation method is developed to generate/compute response functions for the coarse mesh transport (COMET) method, which provides whole-core neutron transport solutions to various reactor core types. In this approach, the response functions are first generated at a reference eigenvalue point, and the response functions at an arbitrary eigenvalue are computed as a high-order perturbation from the reference point. The method has been tested at both the lattice level (response function generation) and the core level (whole-core transport calculations). At the lattice level, it is found that the response functions predicted by the perturbation method agree very well with those directly computed by the Monte Carlo method. The average relative difference in the surface-to-surface response functions is 0.29% to 0.46% when the eigenvalue k ranges from 0.6667 to 1.5. In whole-core transport calculations, the COMET calculations using the high-order perturbation method are almost identical to those using the interpolation method. The eigenvalue, assembly, and pin fission densities predicted by COMET agree very well with the MCNP reference solution. This indicates that the high-order perturbation response function generation method can achieve the same accuracy as the interpolation method while significantly improving the computational efficiency of the precomputation phase.