ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Powering the future: How the DOE is fueling nuclear fuel cycle research and development
As global interest in nuclear energy surges, the United States must remain at the forefront of research and development to ensure national energy security, advance nuclear technologies, and promote international cooperation on safety and nonproliferation. A crucial step in achieving this is analyzing how funding and resources are allocated to better understand how to direct future research and development. The Department of Energy has spearheaded this effort by funding hundreds of research projects across the country through the Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP). This initiative has empowered dozens of universities to collaborate toward a nuclear-friendly future.
A. Hébert, G. Mathonnière
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 115 | Number 2 | October 1993 | Pages 129-141
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE115-129
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Proposals are made for improving current second-generation superhomogénéisation (SPH) methods in three different ways and to use them in heterogeneous and homogeneous diffusion procedures for reactor design and operating calculations. The first improvement consists of using a surface radial leakage model in the flux calculation to represent the macroscopic flux curvature in the assembly. The second improvement is accomplished by the introduction of the Selengut normalization in the SPH equivalence procedure replacing the flux-volume normalization currently used with second-generation methods. Finally, the buckling calculation is improved to better represent the target color-set. Second- and third-generation SPH techniques for heterogeneous or homogeneous diffusion procedures are now implemented as a unified algorithm in a lattice code. Two-group benchmarks are proposed to measure precisely the equivalence effectiveness and the improvement gained with third-generation methods.