ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DTRA’s advancements in nuclear and radiological detection
A new, more complex nuclear age has begun. Echoing the tensions of the Cold War amid rapidly evolving nuclear and radiological threats, preparedness in the modern age is a contest of scientific innovation. The Research and Development Directorate (RD) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is charged with winning this contest.
D. C. Leslie, J. G. Hill
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 26 | Number 2 | October 1966 | Pages 222-229
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE66-A28164
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In resonance capture calculations, it is usual to assume that the capture in any one resonance is unaffected by the existence of other resonances: this is known as the “flux recovery” assumption. This assumption is exact for hydrogenous moderation in a homogeneous situation. However, in highly heterogeneous lattice cells such as that of the Steam Generating Heavy Water Reactor (SGHW), in which the fuel is intimately associated with a powerful moderator, the resonance flux in the fuel is depressed below that in the bulk moderator. In this paper, this flux depression effect is investigated by using a model in which all moderation is hydrogenous and the resonances are square. This model suggests that the flux recovery assumption will overestimate 238U capture in a typical SGHW Lattice by about 5%.