ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
S. Sanatani, L. S. Kothari
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 11 | Number 2 | October 1961 | Pages 211-217
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE61-A28066
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To study the diffusion of thermal neutrons in a solid medium, we divide the neutron energy range into two groups, one above and another below the Bragg cutoff energy for the medium. We then apply the method of groups to study the problem. As examples we have considered infinite slabs of beryllium at temperatures of 100°K and 300°K, with an infinite plane source of neutrons at one end of the slab. The flux distributions and the mean neutron energy are calculated for the different cases. It is found that, while for beryllium at 300°K the mean energy is not very much different from the Maxwellian value, for beryllium at T = 100°K results are markedly different from those for a Maxwellian distribution at that temperature. In order to emphasize the effect of the interaction between the two groups in determining the equilibrium flux distributions, we have also made calculation neglecting the interaction and compared these with the earlier results which take account of the interaction.