ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Industry Update—February 2026
Here is a recap of recent industry happenings:
Supply chain contract signed for Aurora
Oklo, the California-based developer of the Aurora Powerhouse sodium-cooled fast-neutron reactor, has signed a contract with Siemens Energy that is meant to de-risk supply chain and production timeline challenges for Oklo. Under the terms, Siemens will design and deliver the power conversion system for the Powerhouse, which is to be deployed at Idaho National Laboratory.
M. M. Meier, D. A. Clark, C. A. Goulding, J. B. McClelland, G. L. Morgan, C. E. Moss, W. B. Amian
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 102 | Number 3 | July 1989 | Pages 310-321
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A27480
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Differential (p,xn) cross sections, d2σ/dΩ dEn, from thin targets and absolute neutron yields from stopping-length targets at angles of 7.5, 30, 60, and 150 deg for the 113-MeV proton bombardment of elemental beryllium, carbon, aluminum, iron, and depleted uranium are measured. Additional cross-section measurements are reported for oxygen, tungsten, and lead. Time-of-flight techniques are used to identify and discriminate against backgrounds and to determine the neutron energy spectrum. Comparisons of the experimental data with intranuclear-cascade evaporation model calculations with the HETC code show discrepancies as high as a factor of 7 in the differential cross sections. These discrepancies make it possible to identify some of the good agreement seen in the stopping-length yield comparison as fortuitous cancellation of incorrect production estimates in different energy regimes.