ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
D. E. Wood
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1959 | Pages 45-48
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A27328
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron leakage through a reactor shield composed primarily of iron is discussed. This is of interest whenever the hydrogen content of a shield is reduced either by design requirements or thermal deterioration. Work done at several sites on individual aspects of the problem is combined to present an over-all description of the neutron streaming. In general there are two different phenomena involved, each determined by the geometry. In the case of a long thin streaming path, such as a structural member penetrating the shield, the leakage consists of neutrons which have suffered no collisions. These neutrons will have energies corresponding to energies at which the iron total cross section is small. Iron has several antiresonances in the interval 25 to 100 kev, with the largest dip apparently at 25 kev, so most of the neutron leakage will be at these energies. The other case involves the attenuation of neutrons by large slabs of iron with little or no hydrogen (or other good moderator) present. The 25 kev neutrons are still present, but they are augmented by a large number of neutrons of energy between thermal and 1 Mev. These neutrons may have collided elastically many times but with only a small energy loss each time. Above 1 Mev, inelastic scattering suppresses the leakage, and below a few volts, absorption removes the neutrons.