ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
K. Wisshak, F. Käppeler
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 66 | Number 3 | June 1978 | Pages 363-377
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27219
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron capture cross sections of 240Pu and 242Pu were measured in the energy range from 10 to 90 keV. The capture cross sections of both 197Au and 238U were chosen as standards. Neutrons were produced via the 7Li(p,n) reaction with the Karlsruhe 3-MV pulsed Van de Graaff accelerator. Capture events were detected by a Moxon-Rae detector. The high neutron flux available at flight paths as short as ∼10 cm offers a signal-to-background ratio one order of magnitude better than obtained in previous experiments. The cross-section ratios could therefore be determined with a total statistical and systematic uncertainty of 4 to 10% for 240Pu and 6 to 10% for 242Pu. The results agree with previous data, while discrepancies to the evaluated files ENDF/B-IV and KEDAK 3 were found (up to 30% for 240Pu and up to 50% for 242Pu).