ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Katsuhei Kobayashi, Yoshiaki Fujita, Tohru Oosaki, Robert C. Block
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 65 | Number 2 | February 1978 | Pages 347-353
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27162
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron average total cross section of thorium has been measured near 24 keV in an accurate transmission experiment using the time-of-flight method and the iron-filtered-beam technique. The measured average total cross section is 14.933 ± 0.041 b. The computer codes BABEL and MCROSS were used to stochastically calculate average cross sections near 24 keV from several sets of resonance parameters. The average total cross section calculated from the Forman et al. data set is in good agreement with the experimental results, but the cross section calculated from the ENDF/B-IV data set is 16% lower than the measured value. The major part of this 16% discrepancy is attributed to too small a nuclear scattering radius in the ENDF/B-IV data set.