ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
R. D. McKnight
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 309-330
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A26967
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of benchmark calculations of critical experiments has been performed to assess the effects that recent changes in the ENDF/B data files have had on calculated liquid-metal fast breeder reactor parameters. Three well-documented critical assemblies were studied using standard methods of fast reactor analysis (two-dimensional multigroup diffusion theory) with both ENDF/B-III and -IV. A review of the changes in the principal cross sections incorporated in the latest evaluation has been made and was used to interpret the changes in calculated integral parameters. Some of the principal cross-section modifications included in ENDF/B-IV were: decreasing (≈2%), src ="fig002.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%), and src ="fig003.gif" alt=""/> (≈3 to 4%) and increasing src ="fig004.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%). In general, improved agreement between measured and calculated integral parameters has been obtained with the new ENDF/B evaluation. The overprediction of 28c/49 ƒ is reduced slightly (≈1.5%); the central worth calculation-to-experiment discrepancy is generally reduced (≈5 to 15%); and little change occurs in the calculated eigenvalues that remain ≈1.0 to 1.5% δk low.