ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS seeks program evaluators for ABET accreditation
When ABET visits universities for accreditation purposes, it’s crucial that a qualified nuclear expert performs the assessment of that school’s nuclear engineering, radiological engineering, and/or health physics programs. The Accreditation Policies and Procedures Committee (APPC) of the American Nuclear Society works to ensure that a program evaluator (PEV) from the Society leads these ABET assessments.
R. D. McKnight
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 2 | February 1977 | Pages 309-330
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A26967
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of benchmark calculations of critical experiments has been performed to assess the effects that recent changes in the ENDF/B data files have had on calculated liquid-metal fast breeder reactor parameters. Three well-documented critical assemblies were studied using standard methods of fast reactor analysis (two-dimensional multigroup diffusion theory) with both ENDF/B-III and -IV. A review of the changes in the principal cross sections incorporated in the latest evaluation has been made and was used to interpret the changes in calculated integral parameters. Some of the principal cross-section modifications included in ENDF/B-IV were: decreasing (≈2%), src ="fig002.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%), and src ="fig003.gif" alt=""/> (≈3 to 4%) and increasing src ="fig004.gif" alt=""/> (≈1 to 1.5%). In general, improved agreement between measured and calculated integral parameters has been obtained with the new ENDF/B evaluation. The overprediction of 28c/49 ƒ is reduced slightly (≈1.5%); the central worth calculation-to-experiment discrepancy is generally reduced (≈5 to 15%); and little change occurs in the calculated eigenvalues that remain ≈1.0 to 1.5% δk low.