ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS seeks program evaluators for ABET accreditation
When ABET visits universities for accreditation purposes, it’s crucial that a qualified nuclear expert performs the assessment of that school’s nuclear engineering, radiological engineering, and/or health physics programs. The Accreditation Policies and Procedures Committee (APPC) of the American Nuclear Society works to ensure that a program evaluator (PEV) from the Society leads these ABET assessments.
W. L. Filippone
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 1 | January 1977 | Pages 69-91
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A26940
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several new formulations of the response matrix doubling technique, which employ the combined use of a coarse and fine angular mesh, have been developed. The fine angular mesh is used to represent particle distributions that are highly anisotropic, while the coarse angular mesh is used for angular distributions that are more nearly isotropic. The fine and coarse mesh distributions are related by nonsquare response matrices. Calculations of transmitted and reflected currents for simple one-speed slab problems indicate that the new formulations can greatly improve the efficiency of response matrix calculations. Reflected currents calculated by using one of the new response matrix formulations were found to be 9 to 40 times more accurate than those obtained from conventional response matrix calculations using comparable computational effort. Improvements in transmitted current calculations were nearly as great. The new formulations also are applicable to more realistic calculations. The results of a multigroup calculation were quite encouraging. For energy-dependent problems, we can use a coarse and fine energy mesh as well as a coarse and fine angular mesh, so the potential for improvement appears to be even greater than for one-speed problems.