ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
John G. Kollas and Allan F. Henry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 60 | Number 4 | August 1976 | Pages 464-471
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26907
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for obtaining homogenized group-diffusion-theory parameters for heterogeneous nodes (fuel regions plus control elements plus structure) in slab geometry is described. The parameters obtained reproduce exactly the neutron leakage and the integrated reaction rates of the node when it becomes part of a reactor. However, for asymmetric nodes they depend on the fluxes and currents at the surfaces of the node. The sensitivity of this dependence is examined for a one-group model, and numerical examples are given to illustrate that for symmetric nodes, the equivalent parameters are indeed exact and independent of conditions outside the node. For unsymmetric nodes, it is shown that using a set of parameters that is an average of two sets of “exact parameters,” one appropriate to large values of current-to-flux ratio at one of the nodal surfaces and the other appropriate to small values, still yields quite accurate results. For both cases comparisons with results obtained using standard flux-weighted parameters are made.