ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
J. T. Mihalczo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 60 | Number 3 | July 1976 | Pages 262-275
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-4
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective delayed neutron fraction from fission was determined for an unreflected uranium (93.2 wt% 235U) metal sphere from the ratio of time-correlated counts in a randomly pulsed neutron measurement to those in a Rossi-α measurement. In the randomly pulsed neutron measurements, a 252Cf source was placed in the sphere which contained a fission counter that, because of its location, did not count neutrons directly from the source. Neutrons from spontaneous fission of 252Cf initiated fission chains in the sphere, and the fission counter detected events from the interaction of neutrons from these fission chains with the uranium of the fission counter. A Type I time analyzer was triggered each time a 252Cf nucleus fissioned and recorded the time distribution of neutrons from the fission chains initiated by neutrons from californium at t = 0. The delayed neutron fraction by this method (60.2 ± 0.8 × 10−4) is ∼11% lower than that from other measurements or calculations that are all in agreement. This low value may be due to an improper theoretical formulation for the correction of point kinetics for spatial effects. The value of this correction factor estimated by another theoretical formulation is 30% larger. An 11% larger correction for spatial effects would produce agreement between this measurement and previously measured results.