ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
M. A. Abdou, C. W. Maynard
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 56 | Number 4 | April 1975 | Pages 381-398
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A26684
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The calculational methods developed for nuclear heating in an earlier paper are applied to fusion-reactor blankets and shields. The study shows that the nuclear heating in fusion-reactor blankets has been previously overestimated and is limited to ≈16 MeV per DT neutron in the absence of beryllium or fissionable materials. Methods are also examined for increasing the energy multiplication in the blanket by maximizing the rates of exothermic reactions. A general study of the sensitivity of the neutron energy deposition to changes in basic nuclear data is carried out: this study shows the following: 1. The (n, charged particles) reactions, in general, contribute ≈30 to 50% to the neutron heating in typical fusion-reactor spectra. The data for these reactions, however, are not well known and in some cases are absent from the literature. 2. Approximating the neutron heating due to the (n, n′, charged particles) reactions by that from the (n, n′) part only, amounts to ignoring 80 to 90% of the heating. 3. For reference fusion-reactor spectra, a change in the average secondary neutron energy, n′ l, of the 7Li(n, n′α)t reaction results in a relative change in the neutron heating in 7Li which is approximately one-third of that in n′, l. 4. The relative change in the neutron heating by elastic scattering due to a change in the angular distribution is larger than the relative change in . Ignoring the anisotropy of scattering can result in severely overestimated kerma factors. 5. The local energy deposition by radioactive decay is on the order of or less than 2% in most materials in typical spectra for controlled thermonuclear reactors.