ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2025
Latest News
ANS designates Armour Research Foundation Reactor as Nuclear Historic Landmark
The American Nuclear Society presented the Illinois Institute of Technology with a plaque last week to officially designate the Armour Research Foundation Reactor a Nuclear Historic Landmark, following the Society’s decision to confer the status onto the reactor in September 2024.
M. H. Lletzke, R. W. Stoughton, Marjorie P. Lietzke
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 16 | Number 1 | May 1963 | Pages 25-30
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26475
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A generalized least squares technique has been used to calculate equilibrium constants and their variation with medium in solvent extraction equilibria by minimizing the difference between observed and calculated distribution ratios. The model involved a Debye-Hückel term for low and a linear term for high ionic concentration corrections (i.e., activity coefficient changes) in the aqueous phase, consistent with current semitheoretical treatments. In the organic phase either no correction or a linear term in volume % TBP was found adequate to about 20 vol. % TBP. The method involved the evaluation of the assumed parameters in the least squares sense while iteratively correcting for ionic strength changes with varying (calculated) ionic concentrations. Due to imprecision of the data and to convergence difficulties encountered in nonlinear procedures, it was not feasible to evaluate as many parameters as desired, and hence the model had to be oversimplified in some cases. Nevertheless, the method has been successfully applied to the extraction of uranyl nitrate and nitric acid by TBP dissolved in an inert diluent. It is suggested that with sufficiently precise and consistent data the method is capable of evaluating all the equilibrium parameters involved in relatively complex extraction systems. A series of computer programs has been written in an attempt to calculate distribution ratios in relatively complex solvent extraction systems. The general procedure involved setting up equilibrium expressions and determining the parameters by a generalized least squares technique. The present paper describes calculations on the distribution of UO2(NO3)2 and HNO3 between an aqueous phase and an organic phase consisting of tributyl phosphate (TBP) dissolved in an inert diluent (Amsco 125-90W).1 Since it was desired to keep the model simple and since convergence difficulties were encountered when the model was made more realistically elaborate, the assumed equilibria do not necessarily involve all species which may have been shown to exist in some of the solutions in question (e.g., UO2NO3+ and UO2(NO3)2).
