ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The journey of the U.S. fuel cycle
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
While most big journeys begin with a clear objective, they rarely start with an exact knowledge of the route. When commissioning the Lewis and Clark expedition in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson didn’t provide specific “turn right at the big mountain” directions to the Corps of Discovery. He gave goal-oriented instructions: explore the Missouri River, find its source, search for a transcontinental water route to the Pacific, and build scientific and cultural knowledge along the way.
Jefferson left it up to Lewis and Clark to turn his broad, geopolitically motivated guidance into gritty reality.
Similarly, U.S. nuclear policy has begun a journey toward closing the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle. There is a clear signal of support for recycling from the Trump administration, along with growing bipartisan excitement in Congress. Yet the precise path remains unclear.
G. C. Hanna
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 15 | Number 3 | March 1963 | Pages 325-337
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26444
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Skyrme has given a theoretical treatment of the perturbation of the neutron flux in a diffusing medium by an absorbing foil. His theory is re-examined, with particular reference to the modification proposed by Ritchie and Eldridge, and the “edge correction” is evaluated. The accuracy of this modified Skyrme theory is tested by comparison with Dalton and Osborn’s computer calculations for monokinetic neutrons; the agreement is generally better than 1%. This theory is then extended to a Maxwellian neutron spectrum, for which computer calculations are not available, with the result
A is the activity per unit mass of a foil of thickness τ (in units of the absorption mean free path), Ao that of a zero thickness foil, , where t and R are the thickness and radius of the foil. The bars denote averages over the Maxwellian spectrum. The flux-depression parameter g is of the order of R/λtr, but its exact value depends on the velocity dependence of the transport mean free path, and on the thermalization properties of the medium. This formula is used to obtain, from the available measurements of the dependence of A on foil thickness, “experimental” values of g. For both graphite and hydrogenous media they are smaller than expected.