ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Deep Fission raises $30M in financing
Since the Department of Energy kicked off a 10-company race with its Nuclear Reactor Pilot Program to bring test reactors on line by July 4, 2026, the industry has been waiting for new headlines proclaiming progress. Aalo Atomics broke ahead of the pack first by announcing last week that it had broken ground on its 50-MWe Aalo-X at Idaho National Laboratory.
M. A. Robkin, M. Clark, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 8 | Number 5 | November 1960 | Pages 437-442
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25826
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is observed that the formal mathematical adjoint of the integral form of the solution of the Boltzmann equation is not the same as, and is not a solution for, the formal mathematical adjoint to the integro-differential form. If the concept of importance is to have a unique physical meaning, there must be a basic physical difference between the adjoint integral and the integral solution to the integro-differential equation. We show that such a physical difference can be specified, that the concept of “inverse causality” is unnecessary, and that normal “forward” causality is sufficient to derive the importance from first principles. The resulting equations for the importance distributions are then shown to be completely consistent with all requirements of orthogonality between these distributions and the neutron distributions.