ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Lewi Tonks
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 3 | September 1959 | Pages 202-213
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A quantitative but simple theory of the control effect of a uniformly distributed set of thermal poison elements in a hydrogen-moderated bare reactor core has been developed. Starting with plane parallel poison sheets, a zero-flux boundary condition, in a slab core and applying Fourier analysis, it has been possible to generalize to any boundary condition, to orthogonally intersecting sets of poison sheets in an infinite rectangular core, to control crosses, and cylindrical rods in regular array, to finite rectangular cores, and to finite cylindrical cores. Each element of the control array is associated with a cross-sectional area Ac within the core and within this area is an easily determined effective “absorption area” C. To a rather good accuracy the critical k of the controlled core is greater than the k of the uncontrolled core by the ratio Ac/(Ac − C). In this the theoretically based conclusion substantiates the intuitionally based and empirically confirmed methods worked out by Greebler (1), and by Pearlstein, Ruane, and Storm (2), and furnishes correction terms.