ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
IAEA program uses radioisotopes to protect rhinos
After two years of testing, the International Atomic Energy Agency and the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, have begun officially implementing the Rhisotope Project, an innovative effort to combat rhino poaching and trafficking by leveraging nuclear technology.
T. F. Ruane, M. L. Storm
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 2 | August 1959 | Pages 119-127
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25641
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Epithermal nonabsorption probabilities for neutron absorbers are important parameters in the evaluation of control rod worths. In this article, the average epithermal nonabsorption probability () for hafnium slabs is calculated by two different methods: (1) Within the framework of a specific two-dimensional, three-energy-group calculational scheme, an empirical value of is determined which gives agreement with experimental rod worths. (2) Based on available microscopic cross-section data for the hafnium isotopes, the value of is calculated and compared with the empirical value obtained above. The values of obtained by these different methods for 0.1 in. and 0.2 in. thick slabs agree to within 10 per cent, thus verifying the physical reasonableness of the empirical probabilities.