ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NextEra and Google ink a deal to restart Duane Arnold
A day anticipated by many across the nuclear community has finally arrived: NextEra Energy has officially announced its plans to restart Iowa’s only nuclear power plant, the Duane Arnold Energy Center.
T. F. Ruane, M. L. Storm
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 6 | Number 2 | August 1959 | Pages 119-127
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25641
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Epithermal nonabsorption probabilities for neutron absorbers are important parameters in the evaluation of control rod worths. In this article, the average epithermal nonabsorption probability () for hafnium slabs is calculated by two different methods: (1) Within the framework of a specific two-dimensional, three-energy-group calculational scheme, an empirical value of is determined which gives agreement with experimental rod worths. (2) Based on available microscopic cross-section data for the hafnium isotopes, the value of is calculated and compared with the empirical value obtained above. The values of obtained by these different methods for 0.1 in. and 0.2 in. thick slabs agree to within 10 per cent, thus verifying the physical reasonableness of the empirical probabilities.