ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Orrington E. Dwyer, Herbert E. Howe, Edward R. Avrutik
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 12 | Number 1 | January 1962 | Pages 15-22
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A25364
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The liquid-metal-fuel reactor concept, which has received much attention in recent years, in its commonest version is a thermal breeder and employs as a fuel a dilute solution of U in molten Bi. About 28% of the nonvolatile fission products are less reactive chemically than U. This group, customarily referred to as the FPN group, is further divided into three subgroups according to the proposed methods of removal. The FPN-I's would be removed by oxidizing them to chlorides with fused salts, the FPN-II's by precipitating them directly from the liquid fuel, and the FPN-III's by reaction with Zn to form low-density intermetallic compounds which are insoluble in Bi. The FPN-II's, representing about 90% of the FPN's, would be removed continuously, while the others, because of their low yields or relatively low thermal cross sections, would be allowed to build up in the fuel for several years without causing any particular concern. Eventually, however, they would have to be removed. The FPN-I's would be removed by the same continuous process proposed for removing those nonvolatile fission products which are more reactive than U, while the FPN-III's would be removed in a batch process similar to that currently used in the refining of Bi. The following paper includes information on the rates of build-up of the several important FPN elements in the fuel, steady-state concentrations of the FPN-II elements, reactor poisoning level of the FPN's, and experimental results in support of the proposed methods of removal.