ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS awards new Presidential Citations
Twice per year, the American Nuclear Society confers Presidential Citations on individuals who have demonstrated outstanding efforts benefiting ANS or the broader nuclear community.
Last week at the opening plenary of the 2026 ANS Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., immediate past president of ANS Hash Hashemian named this season’s recipients of the award.
Nozomu Fujimoto, Kiyonobu Yamashita, Naoki Nojiri, Mituo Takeuchi, Shingo Fujisaki, Masaaki Nakano
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 150 | Number 3 | July 2005 | Pages 310-321
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE03-79
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Annular cores were formed in start-up core physics tests of the High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) to obtain experimental data for verification of design codes. The first criticality, control rod (CR) positions at critical conditions, neutron flux distribution, excess reactivity, etc., were measured as representative data. These data were evaluated with the MVP Monte Carlo code, which can consider directly the heterogeneity of coated fuel particles (CFPs) distributed randomly in fuel compacts. It was made clear that the heterogeneity effect of CFPs on keff's for annular cores is smaller than that for fully loaded cores. The measured and the calculated keff's agreed with each other with differences <1%k. The calculated neutron flux distributions agreed with the measured results. A revised method was applied for evaluation of excess reactivity to exclude the negative shadowing effect of CRs. The revised and calculated excess reactivity agreed with differences <1%k/k.