ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Deep Fission to break ground this week
With about seven months left in the race to bring DOE-authorized test reactors on line by July 4, 2026, via the Reactor Pilot Program, Deep Fission has announced that it will break ground on its associated project on December 9 in Parsons, Kansas. It’s one of many companies in the program that has made significant headway in recent months.
Hyun Chul Lee, Ku Young Chung, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 147 | Number 3 | July 2004 | Pages 275-291
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE04-A2433
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The two popular transverse integrated nodal methods (TINMs), the nodal expansion method (NEM) and analytical nodal method (ANM), and the analytic function expansion nodal (AFEN) method are integrated into a single unified nodal formulation for the space-time kinetics calculations in rectangular core geometry. In particular, the nodal coupling equations of the conventional ANM and AFEN method are reformulated by the matrix function theory based on the unified nodal method (UNM) principle for the solution to the transient two-group neutronics benchmark problems. The difference between the two transient AFEN formulations by the UNM and the conventional AFEN principles is pointed out. The performance of the UNM formulation is examined in terms of the solutions to the transient light water reactor benchmark problems such as the Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on Reactor Physics pressurized water reactor rod ejection kinetics benchmark problems. Through comparison of several nodal computational options by the UNM formulation, it is shown that one node-per-fuel assembly (N/A) calculations by the AFEN method are superior to those by the NEM and the ANM, but that 4 N/A calculations by the AFEN method are not better than those by ANM, in prediction accuracy at the sacrifice of the computational time. The advantages of the transient UNM formulation over the conventional TINM and AFEN method formulations are discussed.