ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC provides timeline update on rules, meeting EO deadline
Last May, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14300, “Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” which mandated that the NRC review and overhaul its rules within 18 months of the EO being issued.
At a public meeting on Thursday, NRC officials shared details and an overview of the rulemaking process, saying that they were on target to have these rules ready by the November 23 deadline.
Hyun Chul Lee, Ku Young Chung, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 147 | Number 3 | July 2004 | Pages 275-291
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE04-A2433
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The two popular transverse integrated nodal methods (TINMs), the nodal expansion method (NEM) and analytical nodal method (ANM), and the analytic function expansion nodal (AFEN) method are integrated into a single unified nodal formulation for the space-time kinetics calculations in rectangular core geometry. In particular, the nodal coupling equations of the conventional ANM and AFEN method are reformulated by the matrix function theory based on the unified nodal method (UNM) principle for the solution to the transient two-group neutronics benchmark problems. The difference between the two transient AFEN formulations by the UNM and the conventional AFEN principles is pointed out. The performance of the UNM formulation is examined in terms of the solutions to the transient light water reactor benchmark problems such as the Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on Reactor Physics pressurized water reactor rod ejection kinetics benchmark problems. Through comparison of several nodal computational options by the UNM formulation, it is shown that one node-per-fuel assembly (N/A) calculations by the AFEN method are superior to those by the NEM and the ANM, but that 4 N/A calculations by the AFEN method are not better than those by ANM, in prediction accuracy at the sacrifice of the computational time. The advantages of the transient UNM formulation over the conventional TINM and AFEN method formulations are discussed.