ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Taek Kyum Kim, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 3 | July 1996 | Pages 381-391
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24201
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for determining the mathematical adjoint solution of a higher order nodal expansion method (NEM) based on the simultaneous solution of multigroup equations for each node in the rectangular geometry is presented. In the higher order NEM, the forward NEM equations in a given node include not only the nodal balance and interface-current equations but also weighted residual method (WRM) equations for higher order expansion coefficients. In deriving the mathematical adjoint equations corresponding to these forward NEM equations, the transverse leakage terms in the WRM equations need to be replaced by partial currents. Because transverse leakage terms of a node are linked to partial currents of many neighboring nodes, replacement of transverse leakage terms by partial currents results in complicated WRM equations. Because mathematical adjoint equations are obtained by transposing the nodal forward equations, direct use of these complicated WRM equations makes the numerical computation of the adjoint solution inefficient. This problem is avoided by treating the transverse leakage terms contained in the WRM equations as additional unknowns and by including the equations defining the transverse leakage terms in terms of partial currents into the nodal forward equations. The mathematical adjoint equations are then derived by transposing the resulting nodal forward equations. This adjoint solution method is verified by comparing nodal adjoint fluxes with the fine-mesh VENTURE solution for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) pressurized water reactor (PWR) benchmark problem and by comparing the local reactivity changes computed with first-order perturbation theory for the IAEA PWR and the Yonggwang unit 2 PWR with the exact reactivity values determined from the eigenvalue difference between perturbed and unperturbed cores.