ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Godzilla is helping ITER prepare for tokamak assembly
ITER employees stand by Godzilla, the most powerful commercially available industrial robot available. (Photo: ITER)
Many people are familiar with Godzilla as a giant reptilian monster that emerged from the sea off the coast of Japan, the product of radioactive contamination. These days, there is a new Godzilla, but it has a positive—and entirely fact-based—association with nuclear energy. This one has emerged inside the Tokamak Assembly Preparation Building of ITER in southern France.
Edward W. Larsen, J. E. Morel, John M. McGhee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 3 | July 1996 | Pages 328-342
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE123-328
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The multigroup P1 and simplified PN (SPN) equations are derived by an asymptotic expansion of the multigroup transport equation with anisotropic scattering. The P1 equations are the leading-order approximation in this expansion; the SPN equations for N = 2,3,… are increasingly higher order approximations. The physical assumptions underlying these approximations are that the material system is optically thick, the probability of absorption is small, and the mean scattering angle is not close to unity. For multigroup isotropic scattering transport problems, a dispersion analysis is given that verifies the accuracy of the SPN approximations. Numerical comparisons of P1, SPN, and SN solutions are also given. These comparisons show that for low N, SPN solutions are significantly more accurate (transportlike) than P1 solutions and are obtained at a significantly lower computational cost than SN solutions.