ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Powering the future: How the DOE is fueling nuclear fuel cycle research and development
As global interest in nuclear energy surges, the United States must remain at the forefront of research and development to ensure national energy security, advance nuclear technologies, and promote international cooperation on safety and nonproliferation. A crucial step in achieving this is analyzing how funding and resources are allocated to better understand how to direct future research and development. The Department of Energy has spearheaded this effort by funding hundreds of research projects across the country through the Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP). This initiative has empowered dozens of universities to collaborate toward a nuclear-friendly future.
Peter Grimm, Menashe Aboudy, Alex Galperin, Meir Segev
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 122 | Number 3 | March 1996 | Pages 395-406
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24174
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Preliminary to implementing a pin power reconstruction scheme in the nodal core calculations of the ELCOS system, the “main stream” methods and elements thereof were tested against fine-mesh calculations of a number of benchmark “small cores” consisting of uranium, controlled uranium, and mixed-oxide assemblies. Overall, the results do not clearly favor one of the methods. However, test details conduce us to prefer the 32-term expansion for corner-point fluxes over their determination by the separability assumption, and the 21-term expansion of the intranodal flux over the 13-term expansion. There is little difference whether the factorization of the pin power distribution into global and form factors is imposed on the group fluxes or on the power. Data transfers and matrix inversions connected with the many-term flux expansions slow down the nodal calculation. This condition may be alleviated in some cases by an approximation leading to fewer matrix inversions.