ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Bojan G. Petrovic, Alireza Haghighat
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 122 | Number 2 | February 1996 | Pages 167-193
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-3
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An accurate prediction of the reactor pressure vessel (PV) fast neutron fluence (E> 1.0 MeV or E> 0.1 MeV) is necessary to ensure PV integrity over the design lifetime. The discrete ordinates method (SN method) is the method of choice to treat such problems, and the DORT SN code is widely used as a standard tool for PV fluence calculations. The SN numerics and the corresponding DORT numerical options and features offer alternative choices that increase flexibility but also impact results. The effects of SN numerics based on PV fluence calculations for two pressurized water reactors are examined. The differencing schemes [linear, zero-weighted (ZW), and θ-weighted (TW)] and their interactions with spatial and angular discretization are also examined. The linear and TW ( θ = 0.9) schemes introduce unphysical flux oscillations that for certain groups and positions may exceed 10%. The ZW scheme produces smooth results; however, its results differ from the other two schemes. A good compromise for PV fluence calculations is a TW scheme with a small θ value (i.e., θ = 0.3), which reduces the uncertainty to ∼3%. Angular discretization and spatial mesh size employed in typical calculations introduce another ∼3 and ∼2% uncertainty, respectively. The analysis further shows that the fixup is not necessary for the negative scattering source. The pointwise convergence criterion is also not a critical issue in the fast energy range because of a relatively fast convergence rate. Similarly, acceleration parameters impact mainly the execution time and only marginally the results. The root-mean-square combined uncertainty for standard PV fluence calculations due to the options analyzed is ∼5%.