ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
P. A. Landeyro, A. Buccafurni
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 108 | Number 2 | June 1991 | Pages 126-149
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23813
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Estimates are made of the positive reactivity introduced through the growth of the coolant void fraction in the Chernobyl reactor at both the average burnup value given by the Soviets and the maximum value. Using Monte Carlo models, various possible axial burnup distributions, displacer models, conditions in the control channels, and control rod positions are considered in calculating the insertion of positive reactivity by the manual and emergency control rods, that is, the “positive scram.” Two possible scenarios are examined for a second reactivity peak: (a) creation of a mixture of fuel, water, and cladding in a number of central fuel channels, resulting in the explosion of these channels, and (b) uniform vaporization throughout the entire reactor, resulting in reactor depressurization. From the data presented in this study, it can be concluded that vaporization of the cooling water in the fuel channel gave the highest reactivity contribution to the Chernobyl accident. The positive reactivity due to insertion of the manual and emergency control rods played only a minor role in the reactivity balance of the accident.