ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
G. Flamenbaum, R. de Wouters, A. Le Bourhis, T. Newton, G. Vambenepe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 106 | Number 1 | September 1990 | Pages 11-17
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE90-A23752
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The loading of the Superphénix core took place between July 20 and October 3, 1985. The loading of the first core, involving 5.7 tonnes of plutonium, employed a new strategy in the pattern of fuel/dummy assembly replacement moves, known as the checkerboard pattern. This pattern proved highly satisfactory; significant counting rates were obtained on the low-power chambers early in the loading; overall loading time was reduced; and the interpretation of measurements was facilitated., The results were in good agreement with precalculated values, which were reconfirmed by a further, more detailed interpretation that took into account the actual conditions at the time of the reload. The reactivity differences between calculated and measured values for the first critical core loading (containing 33 dummy assemblies) and the fully loaded power core were –0.12 and –0.02% A k/k, respectively. This agreement between experimental and calculated values demonstrates the satisfactory performance of the data sets and methods used in the analysis.