ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
T. G. Theofanous, J. L. La Chance, K. A. Williams
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 102 | Number 1 | May 1989 | Pages 74-100
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission pressurized thermal shock (PTS) study had previously identified small-break loss-of-coolant accidents (SBLOCAs) as a risk dominant accident scenario due to (numerically calculated) primary loop flow stagnation at high pressure. The objectives of the present effort were twofold: first, to develop a physically based understanding of controlling thermal-hydraulic phenomena producing such PTS SBLOCA stagnation scenarios and second, to use these insights in developing a simple (computationally efficient) “mapping” tool to quantify the occurrence and thermal behavior of such high-pressure flow stagnation regimes. Review of the previous [transient reactor analysis code (TRAC)] calculations revealed that inaccurate modeling of vapor condensation erroneously produced the flow stagnation and hence overly conservative (rapid) vessel cooldown rates. Using a corrected version of this code, our new calculations now exhibit flow circulation. However, parametric analysis of less likely (more equipment failure—power-operated relief valves/ high-pressure injection pumps) scenarios revealed that flow stagnation was indeed possible but could only occur at lower pressures. This simple mapping procedure has been favorably benchmarked against the (TRAC) system calculations. This tool is therefore useful for screening possible risk dominant SBLOCA scenarios in various pressurized water reactor designs.