ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Powering the future: How the DOE is fueling nuclear fuel cycle research and development
As global interest in nuclear energy surges, the United States must remain at the forefront of research and development to ensure national energy security, advance nuclear technologies, and promote international cooperation on safety and nonproliferation. A crucial step in achieving this is analyzing how funding and resources are allocated to better understand how to direct future research and development. The Department of Energy has spearheaded this effort by funding hundreds of research projects across the country through the Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP). This initiative has empowered dozens of universities to collaborate toward a nuclear-friendly future.
Toshikazu Takeda, Hironobu Unesaki, Tamotsu Sekiya, Keisho Shirakata
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 100 | Number 4 | December 1988 | Pages 538-548
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23586
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To solve the problems encountered in the analysis of the large homogeneous and heterogeneous fast critical assemblies, Zero-Power Plutonium Reactor (ZPPR) 9, 10, and 13, we have revisited the analysis using improved methods. Two-dimensional cell calculations, cell calculations using multidrawer cell models, and three-dimensional transport theory core calculations were introduced. Using these methods, the discrepancies in the calculation-to-experiment (C/E) values of keff for the fast critical assemblies was reduced. The use of the multidrawer model reduced the C/E spatial dependency of the control rod worths in the ZPPR-10 cores. To investigate the remaining problems of the spatial dependence of the C/E values of reaction rate distribution and control rod worth, we have adjusted a cross-section set obtained from the JENDL-2 library using the integral experiments. The cross-section changes, particularly for the diffusion coefficient, 238U scattering and capture, and 239Pu fission cross sections, have corrected the spatial dependence, as well as the overestimation of the 238U capture to 239Pu fission rate ratio and sodium void worth.