ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Industry Update—February 2026
Here is a recap of recent industry happenings:
Supply chain contract signed for Aurora
Oklo, the California-based developer of the Aurora Powerhouse sodium-cooled fast-neutron reactor, has signed a contract with Siemens Energy that is meant to de-risk supply chain and production timeline challenges for Oklo. Under the terms, Siemens will design and deliver the power conversion system for the Powerhouse, which is to be deployed at Idaho National Laboratory.
T. G. Theofanous, B. Najafi, E. Rumble
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 97 | Number 4 | December 1987 | Pages 259-281
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-A23512
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variety of probabilistic models to quantify the likelihood of steam-explosion-induced (α-mode) containment failure from core melt accidents in commercial light water reactors have been proposed in the past. In many respects, these models and associated mechanistic considerations were complementary. Based on this and taking into account recent research efforts in this area, we perceived a need to consolidate a common approach. A new probabilistic framework is proposed for this purpose. Quantification of all inputs required by this framework is carried out, with the support of three companion parts of the study, for the case of a low-pressure core melt scenario in a pressurized water reactor (neglecting multiple explosions). The results support the generally prevalent expectation that steam explosions do not pose a significant threat to containment. To fully appreciate the qualitative limitations on this result all four parts must be carefully studied.