ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
July 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE extends Centrus’s HALEU production contract by one year
Centrus Energy has announced that it has secured a contract extension from the Department of Energy to continue—for one year—its ongoing high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) production at the American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio, at an annual rate of 900 kilograms of HALEU UF6. According to Centrus, the extension is valued at about $110 million through June 30, 2026.
T. C. Chawla
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 53 | Number 4 | April 1974 | Pages 466-474
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE74-A23377
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is well known that the small-perturbation equations governing steady or mildly unsteady potential flow in a sonic or a transonic gas jet are nonlinear. However, for a liquid-submerged sonic gas jet with a disturbance on the gas-liquid interface, the analysis shows that the unsteadiness introduced into the flow by oscillation of the gas-liquid interface due to presence of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is sufficiently large, the nonlinear disturbance accumulation does not have time to develop, and the linearized treatment that includes the transient motion of gas becomes valid. Through an order-of-magnitude analysis of the full governing equations for the gas flow in a liquid-submerged axisymmetric sonic gas jet with a disturbance at the gas-liquid interface, the condition under which the governing equations can be linearized is obtained. It is shown that this condition of linearization takes the form of the Weber number (We) 26 (p/pg)0.2 for the case of low-viscosity liquids and We 36 for the high-viscosity liquids surrounding the gas jet. (Ug is the gas velocity, p is density, σ is surface tension, and p is the dynamic viscosity.) It is demonstrated that most gas-liquid systems of physical interest satisfy the condition of linearization. Examples of application can be found in the field of pneumatic atomization using a sonic gas jet, and in the field of Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor (LMFBR) safety in relation to thermal transients induced by impingement on a fuel pin of a sonic fission-gas jet released from an adjacent breached pin. For the purpose of comparison with a sonic gas jet, it is also shown that in the case of subsonic and supersonic gas jets, the linearization of equations of motion to a first order is generally possible; that is, the condition of linearization for these jets is not as stringent as for the sonic gas jet. When in transient motion due to a disturbance at the gas-liquid interface having wave velocity much smaller than the gas velocity, the transient terms in comparison to perturbation terms of basic flow are of second order. In contrast to these jets, in the case of a sonic gas jet the transient motion of the gas cannot be neglected even at very slow oscillations of the gas-liquid interface.
